
As editors for the CLR, it is our duty to explore, edit, and cast the works by dozens of writers and poets into a meticulously curated collection—it’s a simple trade-off: authors get to see their work selected and presented to readers, and we receive written works to then market, publish, and celebrate. Within this relationship, however, opportunity for edification and growth arises. While beginning the copyediting process, our editors do individual research on our featured writers and poets, seeking personal websites, features in other literary journals/magazines, and any other platforms they may be using to share their works. This information aids us in the marketing process, allowing for updated distribution, new opportunities for collaboration, and improved rapport with our esteemed authors.
As students, this process is especially crucial to our individual understandings of publishing—with many of us wanting to pursue editing in the future, this opportunity allows us to perform intimate research on our “case studies” for our future professions. We see first-hand the “backstage production” behind decades of the CLR, exposing many first-time editors to the nitty-gritty details and moving parts behind our journal. Because the CLR is student-run, an inevitable learning experience is thinly veiled over this careful undertaking; meaning each step, manuscript, and style sheet is under the review of keenly-peeled eyes, acquiring new details and logistical elements to cultivate and improve our publishing.
Though this operation is controlled, students orchestrate most of the “big decision-making” and are responsible for applying this personal research to our journal’s marketing plan, which varies year after year depending on what information is gathered. Because the editing world is under constant change, it’s up to us to stay on top of what, where, and how our writers are sharing their works. This follow-an-author process allows us to “stay in the loop,” keeping us uniquely updated with where our writers are appearing (e.g. Instagram, Medium, other literary magazines, etc.); this information then becoming applicable to our own literary review and marketing process.
With each year, it is our intention to continually improve, edit, and learn from these processes, fostering creativity and solidifying relationships between us and our writers, as well as discovering new methods to distribute and market our final product. The goal is never to simply regurgitate these writings, but to scrutinize and master each diligent course of action.
—Becca L.






